Anakinra in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: a comprehensive case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is defined by recurring episodes of pericardial inflammation without a known cause. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of anakinra, an interleukin­1 inhibitor, as a successful therapy for IRP in cases resistant to conventional treatment. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients treated at our autoinflammatory center between 2011 and 2023 was conducted. Patient files were examined for demographic, clinical, and treatment response data, including nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and colchicine. Monogenic autoinflammatory disease screening was performed for Mediterranean Fever (MEFV), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase (MVK), nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3), and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2). Patients who experienced multiple episodes of pericarditis were diagnosed with recurrent pericarditis. The study evaluated anakinra treatment in IRP patients unresponsive to conventional therapy. RESULTS: The study included 21 participants, 9 (42.9%) female and 12 (57.1%) male. The average age of the participants was 43.1 ± 16.5 years. The MEFV mutation analysis revealed that 2 (9.5%) had a mutation in exon 10 and 4 (19.0%) had one in exon 2. Out of the 16 cases, 15 successfully discontinued steroid treatment. Four patients (19.0%) experienced injection site reactions. C­reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured at an average of 196 ± 67.8 mg/l before and 2.6 ± 3.15 mg/l after anakinra treatment. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the study adds to the growing evidence for the efficacy of interleukin-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra, as a promising treatment modality for IRP in cases resistant to conventional treatment.

Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with Behcet's syndrome and familial Mediterranean fever: a cross-sectional comparative study on the effects of M-RNA based and inactivated vaccine.

Most of the published data relate to classical forms of rheumatic diseases (RD) and information on rare inflammatory disorders such as Behçet's syndrome (BS) and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is limited. We studied the frequency of side effects and disease flares after COVID-19 vaccination with either Pfizer/BioNTech or Sinovac/CoronaVac in 256 patients with BS, 247 with FMF, and 601 with RD. Telephone interviews were conducted using a questionnaire survey in a cross-sectional design in patients with BS, FMF, and RD followed by a single university hospital. Study participants were vaccinated either with CoronaVac (BS:109, FMF: 90, and RD: 343,) or BioNTech (BS: 147, FMF: 157 and RD: 258). The majority have received double dose (BS: 94.9%, FMF 92.3% and RD: 86.2%). BioNTech ensured a significantly better efficacy than CoronaVac against COVID-19 in all patient groups (BS: 1.4% vs 10.1%; FMF: 3.2% vs 12.2%, RD:2.7% vs 6.4%). Those with at least one adverse event (AE) were significantly more frequent among those vaccinated with BioNTech than those with CoronaVac (BS: 86.4% vs 45%; FMF: 83.4% vs 53.3%; and RD: 83.3% vs 45.5%). The majority of AEs were mild to moderate and transient and this was true for either vaccine. There were also AEs that required medical attention in all study groups following CoronaVac (BS: 5.5%, FMF: 3.3%, and RD:2.9%) or BioNTech (BS: 5.4%, FMF: 1.9%, and RD: 4.7%). The main causes for medical assistance were disease flare and cardiovascular events. Patients with BS (16.0%) and FMF (17.4%) were found to flare significantly more frequently when compared to those with RD (6.0%) (p < 0.001). This was true for either vaccine. BS patients reported mainly skin-mucosa lesions; there were however, 11 (4.3%) who developed major organ attack such as uveitis, thrombosis or stroke. Flare in FMF patients were associated mainly with acute serositis with or without fever. Arthralgia/arthritis or inflammatory back pain were observed mainly in the RD group. Our study demonstrates that BS and FMF patients vaccinated with either CoronaVac or BioNTech demonstrated similar AE profile and frequency compared to RD patients. AEs that required physician consultation or hospitalization occurred in all study groups after either CoronaVac or BioNTech. Increased frequency of flares in BS and FMF compared to that seen in RD might reflect defects in innate immunity and deserves further investigation. Caution should be required when monitoring these patients after vaccination.